Legal Opinion
Corcoran v. Fletcher
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 26, 2001No. 98-5817 WJRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE (1) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION RE: QUALIFIED IMMUNITY; AND (2) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION RE: DECLARATORY RELIEF/UNCONSTITUTIONAL POLICY
REA, District Judge.
In 1998, Plaintiff John Corcoran (“Cor-coran”) filed this lawsuit against Defendant Paul Fletcher (“Fletcher”) and the City of Montebello (the “City”) alleging a violation of Civil Rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. More specifically, Corcor-an claimed that both Fletcher and the City had violated his Fourth Amendment rights to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.
Corcoran’s complaint contained four causes of action. The first claim…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adedeji v. HoderDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Harewood v. BraithwaiteDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Thomas v. CannonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2018