Legal Opinion
Jaime Agustin Agcaoili v. Ernest E. Gustafson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 4, 1988No. 86-5830PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Appellants, Filipinos who served in the United States Armed Forces during World War II, brought this mandamus action to compel the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to process their applications for naturalization, to schedule them for preliminary examinations, to conduct investigations, to make recommendations to the district court concerning their eligibility for naturalization, and to schedule them for final hearings before the district court, in accordance with the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The district court denied both parties’ motions for…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Antonio R. Leyva v. Certified Grocers of California, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Semmes Motors, Inc., Suing on Behalf of Itself and Together With Ford Dealers Alliance, Inc., Etc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Switzerland Cheese Assn., Inc. v. E. Horne's Market, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Confederated Salish Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation v. Mark SimonichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Richard BatisteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Jaime Agustin Agcaoili v. Ernest E. GustafsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Schwartz v. Upper Deck Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1997
- In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.