Legal Opinion

Jaime Agustin Agcaoili v. Ernest E. Gustafson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1989No. 86-5830PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

After the decision by the Supreme Court in INS v. Pangilinan, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2210, 100 L.Ed.2d 882 (1988), we granted rehearing. In light of the Supreme Court’s decision, we withdraw our previous opinion and deny the appellant’s petition for mandamus.

Appellants, Filipinos who served in the United States Armed Forces during World War II, brought this mandamus action to compel the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to process their applications for naturalization, to schedule them for preliminary examinations, to conduct investigations, to make recommendations to the district…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. PangilinanSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Matter of Naturalization of 68 Filipino War Vets.District Court, N.D. California · 1975
  3. Jaime Agustin Agcaoili v. Ernest E. GustafsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Confederated Salish Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation v. Mark SimonichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Severino Abela v. Ernest GustafsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. King Mountain Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Standard Alaska Production Co. v. SchaibleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Mustanish v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API