Legal Opinion
In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 3, 2020No. 4:18-cv-01885Unknown
1Opinion
2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 Case No. 4:18-cv-01885-HSG 8 STIPULATION AND ORDER 9 REQUESTING THAT THE COURT In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation STAY CERTAIN PENDING 10 SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DAUBERT MOTIONS AND VACATE 11 PRETRIAL DEADLINES 12 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Microsoft Corporation and Microsoft Mobile, Inc. (collectively, “Microsoft”), through counsel, 3 hereby respectfully file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order requesting that the Court: (1) stay the 4 pending…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Cmax, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Mediterranean Enterprises, Inc. v. Ssangyong Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Jaime Agustin Agcaoili v. Ernest E. GustafsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988