Legal Opinion
Carolene Products Co. v. Hanrahan, Com. Atty.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided November 28, 1941PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Pulton
— Affirming.
In 1940 the General Assembly of Kentucky passed an act compiled as sections 1905a-60 to 1905a-60f, Carroll’s Kentucky Statutes, Baldwin’s 1940 Supplement, commonly referred to as the Filled-Milk Act. The Act provides that it shall be unlawful to manufacture for sale within this state, or sell or exchange, any “filled milk” as defined in the Act' and penalties are provided for its violation. Pilled milk is defined by Section 1 of the Act as ‘ ‘ any milk, cream, or skimmed milk, whether or not condensed, evaporated, concentrated, powdered, dried,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carolene Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Reesman v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- State ex rel. Mitchell v. Sage Stores Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Carolene Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- Stephens v. Bonding Ass'n of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.