Legal Opinion
Travelers Ins. v. Cardillo
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 20, 1944No. 8567PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGroner, C. J.
This is a compensation case. The appeal is from an order of the District Court dismissing appellant’s complaint for review of an award by the Deputy Commissioner.
The question is whether compensation was allowable under the District of Columbia Compensation Act.1
The Deputy Commissioner found that the injury occurred in Maryland; that the employee was a resident of the District; *363that the employer, a construction company, had its principal office in the District, and at the time of the injury and prior thereto was engaged in construction work there and in the immediate vicinity. Injured, a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- B. F. Goodrich Co. v. BrittonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1943
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Albert Roelofs, Jr. v. United States of America, the Travelers Insurance Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Jonathan Woodner Co. v. MatherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Leroy Stewart v. United States of America, Gary D. Nuss, and Rockwell International Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. National Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.