Leimkuehler v. Shoemaker
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMAN, Commissioner., Action in equity to reform a warranty deed wherein defendant Thelma Shoemaker (third-party plaintiff) conveyed a certain 60-foot lot to plaintiffs. Defendant Shoemaker filed a third-party petition, the effect of which was to confess the allegations of plaintiffs’ petition and to join with plaintiffs in seeking relief against defendants George M. and Nina M. Siglock. The effect of the pleadings was to also seek reformation of a deed given by defendants Siglock to Thelma Shoemaker. A trial resulted in a decree for plaintiffs against defendants Siglock and the action was,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pizzo v. PizzoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Walters v. TuckerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Miller v. St. Louis & Kansas City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Nall v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Osby v. TarltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Allen v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- Schimmel Fur Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Tripp v. HarrymanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Ethridge v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Edwards v. ZahnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.