Legal Opinion

Osby v. Tarlton

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 26, 1935PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Action for personal injury to plaintiff Osby. Yerdict and judgment went for plaintiffs for $10,000, and unsuccessful in motion for a new trial, defendant appealed. Osby was, when injured, employed by plaintiff, Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company, which company and Osby were under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Osby was awarded compensation and he and his employer join in this cause to recover, under Section 3309, Revised Statutes 1929, against the defendant, a third party and the alleged wrongdoer.

Plaintiff Osby was injured by a trailer, drawn by a tractor, being operated at the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Young v. WheelockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Ray County Savings Bank v. HuttonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Spencer v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  4. Gann v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  5. Adams v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Klotsch v. P. F. Collier & Son Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  2. White v. BurkeybileSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Turner v. Central Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  4. Burow v. Red Line Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  5. Hill v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API