Legal Opinion

State v. Bean

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1978No. 7817SC111Published

1Opinion of the Court

ERWIN, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of nonsuit made at the close of the State’s evidence and renewed after the defendant announced that he would offer no evidence. We agree with defendant that the motion should have been allowed.

Upon motion for judgment of nonsuit, the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the State, giving the State the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. State v. Hunter, 290 N.C. 556, 227 S.E. 2d 535 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093, 51 L.Ed. 2d 539, 97 S.Ct. 1106…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. GreenleeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API