Legal Opinion

United States v. Russell

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided April 7, 1999No. 98-0207/AF; Crim.App. 32662PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge CRAWFORD

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Pursuant to his pleas, appellant was convicted of dereliction of duty, false official statement, wrongful disposition of military property, obstruction of justice, and larceny of military property (8 specifications), in violation of Articles 92, 107, 108, 134, and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 892, 907, 908, 934, and 921, respectively. Fourteen larceny specifications were withdrawn as part of the pretrial agreement. The convening authority approved the sentence of a dishonorable discharge, 24 months’ confinement, partial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. HemingwayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  3. United States v. DaileyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. ThomasNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
  2. United States v. McDanielArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  3. United States v. OrellanaUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  4. United States v. Sergeant SCOTT K. STOKESArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
  5. United States v. BartonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API