Legal Opinion

Saltas v. Affleck

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1940No. 6173PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

The action involved in this appeal arose out of a collision in which plaintiff’s son was fatally injured, and the question raised on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant Affleck. Appellant contends that the presumption that the driver of the automobile was doing so as agent of the owner, and acting within the scope of his employment arising from the fact of proof of ownership of the automobile and of the agency should be considered as evidence to be submitted to the jury along with the uncontradicted evidence rebutting…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Fox v. LavenderUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. McFarlane v. WintersUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  4. In Re Newell's Estate &8212 Newell v. BradleyUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Cannon v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. of CaliforniaUtah Supreme Court · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bradley v. S. L. Savidge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Galarowicz v. WARDUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Morrison v. PerryUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State v. PrettymanUtah Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API