State v. Prettyman
Utah Supreme Court
1DissentPratt, Justice
What is the proper application of these words, found in the second paragraph of Section 108-18-11, U. C. A. 1948 (quoted in the prevailing opinion) :
“The making, drawing, uttering or delivering of such cheek, draft or order as aforesaid shall be prima facie evidence of intent to- defraud.”? (Italics added.)
A conviction of this offense of “Issuing Check Against Insufficient Funds” requires proof of four elements: (1) Making, drawing, uttering or delivering the instrument in question; (2) insufficient (or no) funds with which to pay it; (8) knowledge of such insufficiency of or lack of funds;…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1931
- Morrison v. PerryUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Christiansen v. HilberMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Minutilla v. Providence Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929
- In Re Newell's Estate &8212 Newell v. BradleyUtah Supreme Court · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.