Legal Opinion

St. John v. Ivers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 19, 1927No. 17037PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

Separate petitions in error have been filed in this court by Pierce St. John and Anna St. John, but Pierce” St. John alone has briefed the case. Of the numerous assignments of error presented and argued in his behalf the sixth and ninth are determinative of this proceeding. The sixth assignment reads:

“6th. That said court erred in overruling the demurrer of this plaintiff in error to the evidence of the defendant in error."

The order of the court overruling defendant’s demurrer to the evidence of plaintiff reads :

' “The Court: Due to the fact that the answer of Pierce St.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stumpf v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Kaufman v. BoismierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. HolidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Jones v. Citizens' State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. McCabe & Steen Construction Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. De Camp v. ComerfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Russell-Lock Super-Service, Inc. v. VaughnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Holzbierlein v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Kendall v. SharpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API