Legal Opinion
George v. LeBlanc
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided March 15, 1977No. Civ. A. No. CA-3-76-0456-GPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HIGGINBOTHAM, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The court finds plaintiffs Kraus and Fox adequately and fairly represent the interests of the minority shareholders of ACFC and GCL. The second group of plaintiffs, less Allen S. George, Dillard R. LaRue, and A. L. Pinkston, may also proceed derivatively. The Motion to Disqualify Counsel is denied, and Sam Day and Frank Newman shall be lead counsel for plaintiffs.
FACTS1
The court carved these preliminary issues from a derivative suit involving a Dallas corporation, Great Commonwealth Life Insurance Company (GCL), and its publicly owned…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Donovan v. FitzsimmonsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
- Moses v. McGarveyAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Quintel Corp., N v. v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Pittsburgh v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- In Re Fuqua Industries, Inc. Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.