Legal Opinion
American Fire Prevention Bureau, Inc. v. Automatic Sprinkler Co. of America
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 24, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
Defendant, Automatic Sprinkler Company of America (hereinafter called the “Company”), appearing specially, has moved pursuant to Rules 12(b) and 81(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c, for an order vacating and setting aside the service of the summons and complaint herein and dismissing the above-entitled action, upon the ground that the court has no jurisdiction over the person of the defendant.
The complaint herein alleges that the action is brought by the plaintiff, a New York corporation, against the defendant, a Delaware…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Steinway v. Majestic Amusement Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Anderson v. British Overseas Airways Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Lane v. Maple Leaf Milling Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- Marchant v. National Reserve Co. of AmericaUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Shedd v. Willys Motors, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.