Legal Opinion

Shedd v. Willys Motors, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 3, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVET, District Judge.

This is a motion by the third-party de-: fendant, Dana Corporation (hereinafter-called “Dana”), for an order pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28'U.S.C.A., vacating > and setting aside the alleged service of' the supplemental summons and third-party complaint upon it, on the ground' that this Court did not acquire jurisdiction of the said third-party defendant by ■ such service of process and may not ac- ■ quire jurisdiction thereof for the reason that Dana is a foreign corporation which has not and does not maintain a regular and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Amtorg Trading Corporation v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  2. Fergus Motors, Inc. v. Standard-Triumph Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  3. American Chain Co. v. Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1929
  4. American Fire Prevention Bureau, Inc. v. Automatic Sprinkler Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  5. Schenstrom v. Continental Machines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Granite Broadcasting Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. Industrial Waxes, Inc. v. International Railways of Central AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API