Legal Opinion
Lane v. Maple Leaf Milling Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 22, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
Motion iby defendant Maple Leaf Milling Co., Ltd. made pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction over the person of defendant Maple Leaf Milling Co., Ltd. and quashing the purported service of the summons and complaint on the ground that the moving defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada and is not subject to service within the Southern District of New York and on the further ground that the service of the summons and complaint was not made…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Conley v. Mathieson Alkali WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Bank of America v. Whitney Central National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Anderson v. British Overseas Airways Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- In Re the Grand Jury Subpœna Duces Tecum Addressed to Electric & Musical Industries, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Harris v. Deere & Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1955
- State Street Trust Co. v. British Overseas Airways Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Dam v. General Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1953