Legal Opinion

Lorenz v. Royer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1952PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding to determine the custody of James H. Royer, now eleven years of age, and Thomas W. Royer, now nine years of age, minor sons of Helen A. Lorenz and her former husband, Robert W. Royer. The proceeding was instituted by Helen A. Lorenz, as plaintiff, against Robert W. Royer and Ima Royer,, his wife, as defendants. From a decree dismissing the writ and awarding custody of said minor children to defendant Robert W. Royer, plaintiff appeals.

We shall hereafter refer to Robert W. Royer as defendant. The plaintiff and defendant were married at Fort Wayne, Indiana, on…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Griffin v. GriffinOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Bryan v. LyonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Stone v. StoneIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Glass v. GlassMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Quinn v. HanksOregon Supreme Court · 1951

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Matter of Custody of RossOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Fox v. LasleyOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Strahan v. StrahanWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Godfrey v. GodfreyOregon Supreme Court · 1961

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API