Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 10, 1984No. 550-83CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:
Defendant filed, on October 31, 1983, a Motion To Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, To Stay Proceedings, pursuant to RUSCC 12(b)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 1500.
The factual premise of said motion is that on March 26, 1982, plaintiff filed a suit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia praying for reinstatement, back pay and attorney’s fees resulting from an alleged wrongful and unwarranted removal, on January 4, 1979, from his position as Coal Mine Inspector with the Mine Safety and Health Administration, Department of Labor.
No…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Casman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Phillips v. BerglandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Nevada Power Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
3Cited by10 opinions
- Northrop Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- A.C. Seeman, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- New York Power Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Arizona Helicopters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Beauregard Parish Police Jury v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.