Legal Opinion
Geismar v. Bond & Goodwin, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 19, 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MANDELBAUM, District Judge.
The complaint alleges two causes of action against the defendants, Pacific-Atlantic Steamship Company, “Sam” P. Fleming and States Steamship Company. (There are other causes of action pleaded which are not directed against these defendants).
The first cause of action alleges a participation by these defendants in a conspiracy to defraud the plaintiff. The second cause of action realleges the conspiracy and predicates the action under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, § 1 et seq., 15 U.S.C.A. § 78a et seq.
These defendants, in three separate applications, move to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- In Re Keasbey & Mattison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Davega, Inc. v. Lincoln Furniture Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Elevator Supplies Co. v. Wagner Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Kuhn v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Geismar v. Bond & Goodwin, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941