Legal Opinion

Gannon v. Kiel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 1, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Newhall

Plaintiff in error brings this suit to reverse a judgment obtained against him as defendant in the court below in an action brought by the defendant in error to recover damages sustained by her in a collision with plaintiff in error’s automobile.

(For convenience, in this opinion, the defendant in error, Mildred Kiel, will be referred to as plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error, Boland Gannon, as defendant.)

The declaration filed by the plaintiff consisted of two counts, the first alleging general negligence on the part of the defendant in the operation of his automobile, and the second…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. BodemerIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Brown v. Illinois Terminal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Rost v. F. H. Noble & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. McInturff v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Fromm v. SeyllerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Van Cleave v. LynchUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Trennert v. CoeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  3. Kunz v. LarsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  4. Layton v. OgonoskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  5. Cusack v. LongakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API