Legal Opinion

People v. Andrew

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 2003PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant was convicted of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, arising from an incident in a rooming house where both he and the complainant resided. Defendant interposed a defense of justification. The trial court admitted complainant’s hospital record into evidence, but redacted a notation by a resident physician stating that it was impossible to obtain the complainant’s consent to surgery because he was too drunk. Defendant claims that the redaction of this information was error. We note,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. RichettiNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. People v. VelasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 2003

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Bergstrom v. McChesneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. AfrikaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. McMahon v. ThorntonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. People v. BoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Nichols v. NicholsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API