Blue Cross & Blue Shield Ass'n v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Judge.
This dispute centers on a disagreement as to whether plaintiffs are entitled to be reimbursed for a specific cost under certain cost-reimbursement, no-fee contracts with the government. The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA or Board) denied plaintiffs’ claim for reimbursement. Plaintiffs now seek reversal of the Board’s decision under the Wunderlich Act standards (Count I). Plaintiffs also set forth claims based on breach of contract (Count II), restitution (Count III), and an uncompensated taking of property (Count IV). Plaintiffs have filed a motion for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Merritt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Porter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Fincke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Dale Ingram, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Durant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Vistas Construction of Illinois, Inc.Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2016