Legal Opinion
Barragan v. Superior Court of Pima County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 29, 1970No. 2 CA-CIV 825PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
On May 8, 1970, in this special action, we granted petitioner relief from a superi- or court order denying his motion to substitute him as the party plaintiff in a pending lawsuit. 1 Barragan v. Superior Court of Arizona, 12 Ariz.App. 200, 469 P.2d 92 (filed May 8, 1970). A motion for rehearing was timely filed by the respondent real party in interest, Trinidad B. Acosta, 2 and, after consideration of the matter, this court has concluded that modification of our decision is necessary only as to the pending personal injury claim. However, we adhere to our decision that the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Grant v. McAuliffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Landers v. BF Goodrich CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Jordan v. St. Joseph Railway, Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- Patricia Van Sickel, Michael John Van Sickel, Patricia Ann Van Sickel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Braillard v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- DeHerrera v. HerreraWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Halenar v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Hearn v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 2003
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.