Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Homer v. Barrett

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1889No. 13,849PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Posey Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.

— This was a suit, in the court below, upon an *93administrator’s bond, in the usual form. The complaint alleges the appointment of the appellee, George M. Barrett, as the administrator of the estate of George A. Barrett, deceased ; the execution of the bond in suit with the appellee Williams and one William Barrett as sureties; the removal of the appellee George M. Barrett, from the trust, by order of the court, and the appointment of the appellant as his successor. The complaint then alleges seven supposed breaches of the bond, substantially as follows:

First. That an agreement* was entered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hankins v. KimballIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Lane v. State ex rel. Harmon'sIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Rodman v. RodmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Dayhuff v. Dayhuff's AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Convery v. LangdonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Boyce v. TuheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Rush v. State ex rel. BixlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Russell v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API