Legal Opinion

Convery v. Langdon

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1879PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtKiblacic, J.

This was an action by Jerome Convery, as administrator of the estate of Gerhard Eeiter, deceased, *312against Samuel T. Langdon, for a balance alleged to be due upon a settlement of accounts.

The complaint alleged, that on the 16th day of June, 1877, there was a settlement of mutual accounts between the decedent and the defendant,. and that, upon such settlement, there was found to be due to the decedent the sum of fifty-seven dollars and thirty cents, which still remained unpaid. Also, amongst other things, that the decedent had died intestate in July, 1877.

The defendant answered, admitting the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fry v. EvansNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  2. Root v. TaylorNew York Supreme Court · 1822
  3. Rawson v. CoplandNew York Court of Chancery · 1848

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ainsworth v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Carter v. ComptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Coppage v. GreggIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Eigenmann v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. State ex rel. Homer v. BarrettIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API