Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Golden Eagle Archery, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 16, 2000No. 09-96-302 CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STOVER, Justice.
In this products liability action against the manufacturer of a compound bow, Ronald Jackson moved for a new trial alleging juror misconduct, along with other *926grounds. Holding that Tex.R.Civ.P. 327(b) denied Jackson his constitutional right to a fair and impartial jury trial, this court reversed and remanded for a new trial. See Jackson v. Golden Eagle Archery, Inc., 974 S.W.2d 952 (Tex.App. Beaumont 1998), rev’d, 24 S.W.3d 362 (Tex.2000). After granting appellee’s petition for review, the Texas Supreme Court found the rule constitutional, concluded there was no jury…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Larson v. Cactus Utility Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Jones v. Tarrant Utility Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. Ronald JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Jackson, Ronald v. Golden Eagle Archery, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004