Jackson, Ronald v. Golden Eagle Archery, Inc.

OPINION ON REMAND

DON BURGESS, Justice.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

This is the third time this case has been before our court. In our first decision, we considered alleged juror misconduct and the constitutionality of Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 327(b) and Texas Rule of Evidence 606(b), both of which limit proof of juror misconduct. See Jackson v. Golden Eagle Archery, Inc., 974 S.W.2d 952 (Tex. App.-Beaumont 1998) (Jackson I). We found Rule 327(b) unconstitutional and that jury misconduct had occurred. Accordingly, we reversed the judgment and remanded the cause for another trial.

On appeal, the…