Legal Opinion

Varriano v. Bang

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1996No. Civ. 950149, 950150PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

Dale Bang and Leonard Martin appeal from judgments on a jury verdict against them awarding Richard Varriano $800,000 in damages for defamation. We affirm.

Bang hired Varriano to represent him in a divorce from Bang’s wife, Viola. She contested the validity of a prenuptial agreement prepared by attorney Marshall Bergerud. During the divorce trial, Bang settled with Viola for $100,000, upon Varriano’s recommendation.

Near the end of April 1993, Bang sent Varriano a copy of a booklet entitled ‘When Dishonesty Pays,” by “Len Martin,” containing this excerpt:

Why did Varriano settle…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Livingood v. MeeceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Jablonsky v. KlemmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Rickbeil v. Grafton Deaconess HospitalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Williams v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Thompson v. GoetzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Peters-Riemers v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Thompson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Roise v. KurtzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Towne v. DiniusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Dethloff v. DethloffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API