Legal Opinion

Booz v. Reed

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 1960No. Appeal, 56PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Jones,

Tliis action in mandamus was instituted by the plaintiff in an effort to compel the defendant prothonotary of Delaware County to accept for filing in the court of common pleas of that county, without prior court leave sought or obtained as required by the Act of May 17, 1956, P. L. 1626, No. 541, 42 PS §913a, the plaintiff’s transcript on an appeal from a judgment entered against him by a justice of the peace in the sum of $98.12 as damages inflicted by him in an automobile accident.*

In an effort to appeal the judgment entered by the justice of the peace,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Smith CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Taylor v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Medinger AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Unger v. Hampton TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Philadelphia Presbytery Homes, Inc. v. Abington Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. McIlvaine v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Probst v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API