Booz v. Reed
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Jones,
Tliis action in mandamus was instituted by the plaintiff in an effort to compel the defendant prothonotary of Delaware County to accept for filing in the court of common pleas of that county, without prior court leave sought or obtained as required by the Act of May 17, 1956, P. L. 1626, No. 541, 42 PS §913a, the plaintiff’s transcript on an appeal from a judgment entered against him by a justice of the peace in the sum of $98.12 as damages inflicted by him in an automobile accident.*
In an effort to appeal the judgment entered by the justice of the peace,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Smith CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Taylor v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Medinger AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Unger v. Hampton TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Philadelphia Presbytery Homes, Inc. v. Abington Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- McIlvaine v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Probst v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.