Legal Opinion
Stickley v. Chisholm
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 18, 2001No. 2962, Sept. Term, 1999PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Chief Judge.
In the Circuit Court for Allegany County, Charles L. Stickley, III (“Stickley”), appellant, filed a medical malpractice action against Roy D. Chisholm, III, M.D. (“Dr. Chisholm”), appellee. Prior to deliberation, the circuit court instructed the jury that in order for appellant to recover damages, the jury must find that negligence was the cause of the injury. Appellant’s counsel requested that the court re-instruct the jury in accordance with Maryland Civil Pattern Jury Instruction 19:10, which states that in order for the plaintiff to recover, the jury must find that the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Brewer v. Second Baptist ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- McKenna v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Capelouto v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Goldstein & Baron Chartered v. ChesleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Prudential Securities Inc. v. E-Net, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Young v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Kassama v. MagatCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Frankel v. DeaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.