Legal Opinion

Goldstein & Baron Chartered v. Chesley

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 11, 2003No. 94, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilner, J.

The dispute that spawned this litigation arose from the sale of a parcel of land by the Estate of Dr. Erwin Rose to William Chesley. That sale produced a claim by a broker, Coldwell Banker, for a commission on the sale, an agreement by Chesley to indemnify the Estate against any liability for such a commission, and a further agreement by Chesley to alow the attorneys for the Estate, Goldstein & Baron, Chartered (G & B), to defend the claim by Coldwell Banker arid to pay the fees of G & B incurred in that defense. The claim for a commission was litigated and eventually settled. What linger…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Higgins v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Hawes v. Liberty Homes, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Stickley v. ChisholmCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Chesley v. Goldstein & Baron, CharteredCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Poole v. Coakley & Williams Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Reier v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Garner v. Archers Glen Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. French v. HinesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API