Legal Opinion

State v. Kent

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1976No. 43882PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.

Defendants Rosa Natalie Kent and Paul John Hammon appeal an order of the trial court denying their motions to dismiss proceedings against them under the Washington Habitual Traffic Offenders Act (RCW 46.65) upon the ground the act violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the privileges and immunities provision of the state constitution (Const, art. 1, § 12).

The facts are these. On November 3, 1973, Rosa Natalie Kent was charged with being a habitual traffic offender under RCW 46.65. Her driving record shows from November 13, 1968, to September 30, 1973, she…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Markham Advertising Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. ScheffelWashington Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Board of Commissioners for Yakima CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. RhodesWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Aripa v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. MacLean v. First Northwest Industries of America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API