Legal Opinion

National Shawmut Bank v. Jones

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 29, 1967No. 5644PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.

Since Wever purchased for personal, family or household purposes, the Dart is classified as consumer goods. RSA 382-A:9-109. The plaintiff’s security interest was perfected by filing the financing statement with the town clerk of Hampton where Wever resided (RSA 382-A:9-401 (1) (a), and continues when the collateral is sold without its consent as was the case here unless Article 9 provides otherwise. RSA 382-A:9-306 (2). In the case of buyers of goods, Article 9-307 (1) does provide otherwise in certain instances, as follows:

“A buyer in ordinary course of business (subsection (9) of Section…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lincoln Bank & Trust Company v. QueenanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. Walter A. Hext, Sr., Harlingen Compress CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Franklin Investment Co. v. HomburgDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. In the Matter of Gary Aircraft Corporation, Debtor. Gary Aircraft Corporation v. General Dynamics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Deutsche Credit Corp. v. Case Power & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Martin Brothers Implement Co. v. DiepholzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API