Legal Opinion

Lincoln Bank & Trust Company v. Queenan

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 10, 1961PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALMORE, Judge.

This case raises four questions concerning the recording requirements of the Uniform Commercial Code (KRS Chapter 355) as affected, vel non, by certain other statutes. They are: As a condition precedent to recording a financing statement that otherwise complies with Code § 9-402,(1) Does KRS 382.270 require acknowl-edgement of the statement?(2) Does KRS 382.330 require that the maturity date or dates of the security obligation covered by the statement be shown ?(3) Does KRS 382.675 require that motor vehicles in a dealer’s inventory be registered (i. e., licensed under the…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mark D. Dean, P.S.C. v. Commonwealth Bank & Trust Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Varney Wood Products, Inc. v. StricklerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  3. Plemens v. Diddeglaser, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. National Shawmut Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
  5. Mid-Eastern Electronics, Inc. v. First National Bank of Southern Maryland, GarnisheeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API