Lincoln Bank & Trust Company v. Queenan
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
PALMORE, Judge.
This case raises four questions concerning the recording requirements of the Uniform Commercial Code (KRS Chapter 355) as affected, vel non, by certain other statutes. They are: As a condition precedent to recording a financing statement that otherwise complies with Code § 9-402,(1) Does KRS 382.270 require acknowl-edgement of the statement?(2) Does KRS 382.330 require that the maturity date or dates of the security obligation covered by the statement be shown ?(3) Does KRS 382.675 require that motor vehicles in a dealer’s inventory be registered (i. e., licensed under the…
2Cited by25 opinions
- Mark D. Dean, P.S.C. v. Commonwealth Bank & Trust Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2014
- Varney Wood Products, Inc. v. StricklerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- Plemens v. Diddeglaser, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- National Shawmut Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
- Mid-Eastern Electronics, Inc. v. First National Bank of Southern Maryland, GarnisheeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.