Legal Opinion

Martin Brothers Implement Co. v. Diepholz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 13, 1982No. 17680PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Londrigan

Defendant Diepholz appeals from the entry of summary judgment against him in an action for conversion of a tractor. Plaintiffs cross-appeal from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant Compton.

Larry Allen purchased a Caterpillar model D-5 bulldozer from Martin Brothers on June 14, 1976. The purchase of the bulldozer was financed on an installment basis and Martin Brothers retained a security interest in the bulldozer. Martin Brothers perfected its security interest by filing a financing statement with the Secretary of State on June 15,1976.

Allen sold the bulldozer to Delbert…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fooden v. Board of GovernorsIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Nolan v. Johns-Manville Asbestos & Magnesia Materials Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Security Pacific National Bank v. GoodmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Freymark v. HandkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  5. National Shawmut Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Launius v. NajmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Deutsche Credit Corp. v. Case Power & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. Salazar v. Wiley Sanders Trucking Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Miller v. BloombergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. Decatur Production Credit Ass'n v. MurphyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API