Heple v. Kluge
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.
Plaintiff, a building contractor, sued for $19,354.38 for money advanced and services rendered at defendants’ special instance and request, in the construction of a building in San Jose. Defendants pleaded that plaintiff had contracted to construct a building for $22,490 according to certain plans and specifications but had failed to do so. They also filed a cross-complaint for $30,000, of which $5,000 was claimed as damages for the demolition of the alleged unsuitable structure and $25,000 for other accrued and prospective damages. A verdict for. $18,669.47 was returned in plaintiff’s favor…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Soda v. MarriottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Robinson v. American Fish & Oyster Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Quinn v. DresbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Monson v. FischerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Langley v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Miller v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Langley v. Pacific Gas & Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Langley v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Langley v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1953