Legal Opinion

Heple v. Kluge

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 1952No. Civ. 14867PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.

Plaintiff, a building contractor, sued for $19,354.38 for money advanced and services rendered at defendants’ special instance and request, in the construction of a building in San Jose. Defendants pleaded that plaintiff had contracted to construct a building for $22,490 according to certain plans and specifications but had failed to do so. They also filed a cross-complaint for $30,000, of which $5,000 was claimed as damages for the demolition of the alleged unsuitable structure and $25,000 for other accrued and prospective damages. A verdict for. $18,669.47 was returned in plaintiff’s favor…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Soda v. MarriottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Robinson v. American Fish & Oyster Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Quinn v. DresbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Monson v. FischerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Langley v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Miller v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Langley v. Pacific Gas & Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Langley v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Langley v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API