Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John DOE, Defendant-Appellant. (Two Cases)

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 11, 1996No. 95-10493, 95-10494PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

Two juvenile males, appellants Doe # 1 (“M.F.”) and Doe #2 (“I.S.”), were adjudicated juvenile delinquents for committing an act of sexual abuse against another minor. Appellants contend, inter alia, the district court erred in finding that the government had complied with the statutory requirements for properly filing a need certification under 18 U.S.C. § 5032 and 28 C.F.R. § 0.57. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse on the issue of need certification.

I

On January 17, 1995, the government filed an information charging both M.F. and I.S.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Angelo D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Alejandro Ceja-PradoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John DOE, a Juvenile Male, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Male Juvenile (Pierre Y.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Juvenile Male (Kenneth C.),defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Juvenile MaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API