Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John DOE, a Juvenile Male, Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 17, 1999No. 98-50172PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

The district court entered judgment in which John Doe (“Doe”), a juvenile, is determined to be a juvenile delinquent. The court found that Doe knowingly imported merchandise (marijuana) subject to seizure in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 545. On appeal, Doe challenges the sufficiency of the certification that allowed him to be prosecuted in federal court. Doe also asserts that his confession should be suppressed both because he requested counsel and because the government failed to notify his mother of his Miranda rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Billy Russell Clark v. Tim MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. Jose Lombera-CamorlingaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Jose Luis NunezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Alejandro Matus-Leva v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Clydell YoungerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API