Legal Opinion

Kauth v. Bartlett

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 2008No. 24414PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice (on reassignment).

[¶ 1.] Lee O. Bartlett (Bartlett) petitioned to modify his child support obli*749gation after relocating and reducing his income. Even though the child support referee found that Bartlett did not leave his employment for the purpose of reducing his child support obligation, the referee’s report set child support based on the imputed income from Bartlett’s prior job. The circuit court’s order adopted the referee’s report. Bartlett appeals. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] When Bartlett and Melissa Kauth (Kauth) divorced on November 30, 2004, Bartlett’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gross v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Saint-Pierre v. Saint-PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bruning v. JeffriesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Miller v. JacobsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Midzak v. MidzakSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Muenster v. MuensterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Hollinsworth v. HollinsworthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. LitschewskiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Burkard v. BurkardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Condron v. CondronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API