Legal Opinion

State v. Farrow

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1923No. 24,718PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of being a persistent violator of the prohibitory liquor law. He was charged and convicted on four counts.

1. It is urged that the court committed error in sustaining the plaintiff’s demurrer to the defendant’s plea in abatement. The plea alleged—

“That the state of Kansas offered and produced no evidence of testimony of and concerning sales of intoxicating liquor, or apprized this defendant in *203any manner of the nature, of the offense to be met by him, in the charges alleged in said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. State v. ShifflerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. State v. ColeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. State v. BergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. FrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. State v. PendletonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  3. Chapman v. BoyntonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1933
  4. State v. DiehlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API