Legal Opinion
State v. Farrow
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 7, 1923No. 24,718PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Marshall, J.:
The defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of being a persistent violator of the prohibitory liquor law. He was charged and convicted on four counts.
1. It is urged that the court committed error in sustaining the plaintiff’s demurrer to the defendant’s plea in abatement. The plea alleged—
“That the state of Kansas offered and produced no evidence of testimony of and concerning sales of intoxicating liquor, or apprized this defendant in *203any manner of the nature, of the offense to be met by him, in the charges alleged in said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- State v. ShifflerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- State v. ColeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- State v. BergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. FrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- State v. PendletonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- Chapman v. BoyntonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1933
- State v. DiehlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925