Legal Opinion
Fordham v. Fannie Mae
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 20, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2011-1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge
On October 27, 2011, plaintiff brought an action against her employer, defendant Fannie Mae, alleging that the defendant retaliated against her for complaining about race discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e~3(a). Compl. [Dkt. # 1]. On January 6, 2012, defendant moved to compel arbitration in accordance with the terms of plaintiffs employment application and Fannie Mae’s offer letter, both of which referenced the Fannie Mae Dispute Resolution Policy. Def.’s Mot. to Compel Arbitration [Dkt. #5, 5-3, 5-4] (“Mot.'to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Green Tree Financial Corp. v. BazzleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- John Stanton v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Nader v. Democratic National CommitteeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Hemphill v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Post, LLC v. Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Reagor-Dykes Motors, LPUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2020