Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Sugarbaker

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 16, 2015No. 15-1128PPublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.

In this medical malpractice action, Plaintiffs-Appellants Barbara and Michael Bradley appeal the district court’s decision to grant summary judgment as to their medical battery claim. Following a jury trial as to their informed consent claim, they also assert that the district court erred by excluding expert testimony that a fine-needle aspiration (“FNA”) biopsy was a viable non-surgieal alternative to a surgical biopsy. After careful review of the record, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of the Bradleys’ battery claim but vacate and remand with respect to the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Casas Office MacHines, Inc. v. Mita Copystar America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  4. Harnish v. Children's Hospital Medical CenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Elizabeth v. Bogosian v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. And Daimler-Benz North America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Bradley v. SugarbakerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  2. Horowitz v. Luxury Hotels Int'l of P.R., Inc.United States District Court · 2018
  3. (PC) Chester v. KingDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. Adams v. Target CorporationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
  5. Allstate Insurance Company v. Shah, MDDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API