Legal Opinion

Foulk v. Kotz

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 15, 1983No. 2 CA-CIV 4488PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRDSALL, Judge.

The plaintiffs/appellants Foulk appeal a judgment in favor of the defendants/appellees Sol Kotz and Carolyn Noel in a personal injury action. We affirm.

The issue on appeal is whether the trial court improperly restricted the appellants’ cross-examination of a defense witness, Roger Winn. Winn was an investigator for Arizona Adjustment in Tucson who took a statement from the plaintiff, Kenneth J. Foulk. In a pre-trial ruling, the'court precluded any questions which might show that Mr. Winn was associated with insurance. At trial, the court sustained an objection to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  2. Fridena v. EvansArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Muehlebach v. Mercer Mortuary and Chapel, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Montano v. Scottsdale Baptist Hospital, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Arizona Cotton Oil Co. v. ThompsonArizona Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Milke v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Ritchie v. KrasnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. Cervantes v. RijlaarsdamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Lacher v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Stumpf ex rel. Selzer v. Nintendo of America, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API