Foulk v. Kotz
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIRDSALL, Judge.
The plaintiffs/appellants Foulk appeal a judgment in favor of the defendants/appellees Sol Kotz and Carolyn Noel in a personal injury action. We affirm.
The issue on appeal is whether the trial court improperly restricted the appellants’ cross-examination of a defense witness, Roger Winn. Winn was an investigator for Arizona Adjustment in Tucson who took a statement from the plaintiff, Kenneth J. Foulk. In a pre-trial ruling, the'court precluded any questions which might show that Mr. Winn was associated with insurance. At trial, the court sustained an objection to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Fridena v. EvansArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Muehlebach v. Mercer Mortuary and Chapel, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Montano v. Scottsdale Baptist Hospital, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Arizona Cotton Oil Co. v. ThompsonArizona Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Milke v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Ritchie v. KrasnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Cervantes v. RijlaarsdamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Lacher v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Stumpf ex rel. Selzer v. Nintendo of America, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.