Muehlebach v. Mercer Mortuary and Chapel, Inc.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KENNETH C. CHATWIN, Superior Court Judge.
Appellant was plaintiff in a suit for injuries received in an automobile accident. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. The trial judge granted defendants’ motion for a new trial and plaintiff appeals. The sole ground on which the trial judge granted the motion for a new trial was:
“It is ordered that the motion for new trial be, and the same is hereby granted on the grounds of irregularity in the proceedings for the reason that the question of liability insurance has been improperly injected in the case.”
The reference to insurance was made by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Finck Cigar Co. v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Roche v. Llewellyn Iron Works Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Blue Bar Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. HudspethArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Pinkerton v. Oak Park National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
- Causey v. CorneliusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- E. L. Jones Construction Co. v. NolandArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Sequoia Manufacturing Co. v. Halec Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Barsema v. SusongArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- JC Penney Company v. BarrientezSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Lewis v. SwensonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.