Hansen v. Boeing Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RICHARD A. JONES, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss one of Plaintiffs claims. Dkt. # 11. No party requested oral argument, and the court finds oral argument unnecessary. For the reasons stated below, the court DENIES the motion to dismiss.
II. BACKGROUND
For purposes of its motion to dismiss, Defendant The Boeing Company (“Boeing”) concedes every factual allegation in Plaintiff Terrie Hansen’s complaint. Ms. Hansen, a longtime Boeing employee, requested a six-month leave of absence in 2008 to accommodate her back surgery and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Marder v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Sanders v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davy v. Cross Cultural Communications IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Neville v. Griffin MacLean IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Sara Hartman, App v. The Young Men's Christian Assoc Of Greater Seattle, D/b/a, RespCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015