Legal Opinion

Neville v. Griffin MacLean Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 30, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00299Unknown

1Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 ANTONY NEVILLE, et al., CASE NO. C20-0299-JCC 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 GRIFFIN MACLEAN, INC., et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Griffin Maclean, Inc’s (“GMI”) motion 16 for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 12). Having thoroughly considered the parties’ briefing 17 and the relevant record, the Court finds oral argument unnecessary and hereby GRANTS the 18 motion in part and DENIES the motion in part for the reasons…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Andrea Dworkin Priscilla Moree Judith Fouts v. Hustler Magazine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Sanders v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Schoeman v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Hansen v. Boeing Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API