John Hutchison Manufacturing Co. v. Pinch
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Eaton; Smith, J. Assumpsit by the John Hutchison Manufacturing Company against Benjamin W. Pinch for machinery and repairs furnished for defendant’s mill. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This case comes before the court for review a second time. The main- facts of the case are reported in the opinion found in 91 Mich. 156. Before the last trial, defendant amended his notice attached to the plea, setting up as a defense that at the time of the contract the plaintiff agreed that the machines which, were to be used would not require any more power than it required to run the machinery then in the mill. Defendant’s testimony upon this subject was that, upon January 11, 1890, Mr. Hutchison and Mr. Crandall, a millwright employed by plaintiff, were, in company with Mr. Horn,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- McCray Refrigerator & Cold Storage Co. v. Woods & ZentMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Stange v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Cohen v. JackoboiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Nichols, Shepard & Co. v. CrandallMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Castleman-Blakemore Co. v. Pickrell & Craig Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Bingham v. LipmanOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- New Prague Flouring Mill Co. v. Hewett Grain & Provision Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Smith Sand & Gravel Co. v. CorbinWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Bell v. MulkeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.