Legal Opinion

Walker v. Russell

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1858PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from adjustment of costs.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, Justice.

The action was brought by the president of the Bank of Utica, against a number of persons in dif-' ferent parts of the state, who were individual creditors of Russell & Van Valen, also defendants; the bank claiming that Russell & Van Valen were copartners, and that debts due to the bank on certain drafts drawn by Van Valen and accepted by Russell, were a joint charge upon the assets of Russell & Van Valen. Van Valen didbusiness in his individual name, at Cortlandville, and Russell in his individual name, in the city of Hew-York. Russell and one of his creditors, Allen,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fuller Buggy Co. v. WaldronNew York Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Steere v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Mazet v. CrowCity of New York Municipal Court · 1890
  4. Haye v. RobertsonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1874
  5. Mazet v. CrowCity of New York Municipal Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API