Legal Opinion

Lee v. Minnock

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 5, 1976No. Civ. A. 75-657PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHILL, District Judge.

This case comes before the court on Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal. Rules of Civil Procedure, which states:

“After the pleadings are closed but within such time as not to delay the trial, any party may move for judgment on the pleadings. If, on a motion for judgment on the pleadings, matters outside the pleadings are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Rule 56, and all parties shall be given reasonable opportunity…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Karl R. Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage and Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  3. Dorothy Weathers v. Peters Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  4. Scott v. PlanteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. William D. Arnold v. Bert R. TiffanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Weiss v. Willow Tree Civic Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  2. Patel v. Holley House MotelsDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1979
  3. Mergenthaler v. Asbestos Corp. of AmericaSuperior Court of Delaware · 1985
  4. Atlantic Used Auto Parts v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Farrior v. H.J. Russell & Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API